In a message dated 2/12/01 10:42:21 AM Central Standard Time, bounousb@i... writes:
> Belting done > > correctly is not chest taken all way the up, but a longer chest register > > leading to a mix at bflat4, and a connected head voice at e5. Look into > > speech level singing it will help you understand what the process is. > > > > Randy Buescher > > > > This is actually a good description of 'mix' not belt. >
That's why we don't use the word belt in SLS, yet the singers trained this way dominated pop music and have a huge presence on Broadway. Obviously the aesthetic produced is considered appropriate for the genres that use the production called belt and the singers that sing in this manner are using a healthier production. I teach two of the most well known gospel singers in the industry and many would call what the female of this duo does belting, but it is not, it's a high mix and at times a hard gospel mix. The larynx is stable and a lot of what people describe as belting pedagogy (which frankly seems like a cataloguing of hyperfunctional habits and codifying them into something mistakenly called technique) is absent.
It is not a classical sound as most would describe it yet it is not hyperfunctional.
Randy Buescher
|
| |