I recall the adjudicator who gave a 7th grade girl singing her first solo at
contest a Division II rating (not a I, but pretty good and what she
deserved...I was in the room). She was pleased with the rating, as was I.
However, when we got her critique sheets, the only comment of any sort he
made in writing was "Oh you looked so cute...your skirt and your knee-socks
were matching colors~! Thanks for singing for me today!". Rating: II
NOT helpful, obviously, and way out of line. The next thing that occurred
was my addressing my colleagues at the next meeting about contest. This
person's name was taken off the list. A problem which often exists is that,
although someone may be a marvelous teacher, or performer, that same person
is not always a great judge. As you discover those who are positive, honest,
and uplifting judges, hang on to them for dear life! And pass the word that
poor, uncaring, all negative, judging will not be acceptable in your region,
city, or any other judging arena.
NATS experiences these things, as do school groups. There isn't any excuse
for poor judging. There also is no excuse for the hosting group's failure to
set standards or guidelines for judging. If a judge knows those guidelines
and does not follow them, that is another thing. That person does not get
invited again. Period.
Sincerely,
Lynda Lacy, Soprano
Director of Choral Activities, Jackson Preparatory School
Jackson, MS
LYNDA313@a...
|
|  |
