Vocalist.org archive


From:  "Lisa M Olson" <lisa_molson@m...>
Date:  Fri Jun 16, 2000  6:30 pm
Subject:  Re: [vocalist-temporary]Training Methods.


Reg-

I didn't mean to imply that I got no technical background at school, but a) I
firmly believe that technique is CONSTANTLY a process (as in forever, not just
5-6 years) and b) that expression, language and style are equally important for
a singer.

"The inflexibility of educational institutions, seen in this light,
define quite clearly the role of private teachers and associated student
requirements, ..... to match vocal maturation, something that doesn't fit
the conservatory model apparently . "

This was exactly my point - that 18-22 year old singers are not only vocally
young, but musically as well. So the emphasis on these "polishing" elements is
doubly important. The pianists and string players I knew at school had been
studying and playing 10-15 years before the age of 18. The singers had been
studying for anywhere from 1-4 years. That is a big distinction. Technique is
of course vitally important, but not at the expense of MUSIC!

I felt, at the age of 17, that I had been given enough feedback about the
strengths of my voice to decide that this was a career choice for me. I have
not yet (at the age of 30) made my living singing, but I certainly do not blame
the conservatory for this.

Just my thoughts!

Lisa-Marie



Send FREE Greetings for Father's Day--or any day!
Click here: http://www.whowhere.lycos.com/redirects/fathers_day.rdct

emusic.com