YES!!!! I couldn't agree more.. There is a bad stigma with men singing high in their head voice!!! It sounds wimpy, non-manly and too light. This is if they do not have the proper training to adjust this. This is what I am trying to do know. Being a bass-baritone that has always belted my head voice is extremely puny!!! If I were to sing in this it wouldn't be acceptable at all! The second part that I left at the end makes complete sense. To get the head voice to match the chest voice, so that the listener can't tell the difference is a goal that a lot of males are looking for but just don't know how to go about it. "mjmoody2000 <mjmoody@c... wrote: On the other hand, if a man sings a light tone that does not connect well with the chest voice it is most-often labeled "falsetto," and a bad stigma is given to the tone. It seems like somehow a man has to find some (initially) light voice that "connects" to his chest voice or it is wrong. Meanwhile any tone is "accepted" that a woman makes - they are just encouraged to support more, and "build the tone" or something.
To me it is simpler, and probably more accurate, just to say that the light tone up high is usable. The desired effect is to combine it's quality with your lower voice, etc., etc.
John
--- In vocalist-temporary@yahoogroups.com, "Lloyd W. Hanson" <lloyd.hanson@n...> wrote: > Dear John and Vocalist: > > I finally downloaded and listened to the sample you posted of > Pavarotti singing a portion of "Caro mio ben". > > There is no falsetto singing in any portion of this example. His > softest tones are all in head voice. The vocal folds are adducted. > If this is what some on the list call falsetto then it is obvious why > we have had such a difficult time coming to any conclusions about > this subject. > > This Pavarotti sound clip is a classic example of head voice. > -- > Lloyd W. Hanson > >
---------------------------------
|