Vocalist.org archive


From:  "Lloyd W. Hanson" <lloyd.hanson@n...>
Date:  Sun Jun 23, 2002  7:21 pm
Subject:  Re: [vocalist] Classical/non-classical singing

Randy and Vocalisters;

The classical method of voice production is a proven healthy method,
if observed. The fact that classical singers also present vocal
problems is less a criticism of the classical method of singing and
more a criticism of poor application of these methods and/or foolish
overuse of the classical voice even when properly produced.

However, amplification and electronic manipulation will more often
mask poor vocal production than that which appears in classical
singing. This is so because the assistance provide by these
electronic means allows singers to achieve acceptable performance
results without a proper underlying technical vocal foundation. But,
as with all vocal usage, eventually there is a price to pay with any
kind of abuse. It then becomes apparent to the singer that even with
electronic assistance, vocal production problems must be corrected.

However, the methods of vocal training that are most healthful and
productive all must stem from the same organic source. If the
amplified singer is able to produce what Mike refers to as the
"personal" quality" and seldom finds it necessary to sing above a mp
and the classical singer must be capable of a ff, each should produce
the voice via a healthy technique. Although one sings only within a
limited dynamic range and the other at the extremes of the dynamic
range both should function vocally with consideration of physical
limits and acoustic considerations. Styles may be different but the
voice is the same instrument and cannot be driven in improper
directions without dire consequences.


--
Lloyd W. Hanson





emusic.com