Study the following composers for ideal role models when it comes to setting text in a way that never sacrifices the meaning of the text to some strange musical imperative. These are two men who really understood how to depict, in music, the cadences and rhythms of speech. As a result, their music is eminently singable.
Jules Massenet Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
These men clearly understood the voice as an instrument - with all its glorious potential for creating different colours, dynamics, emotions, etc., but also with its limitations (like needing to breathe occasionally). They also seemed to be highly sensitive to the meanings of the texts they set, and very seldom did something as unelegant as putting musical accents on unaccented syllables in the text, or tying phrases through commas and other dramatic textual pauses.
Two composers, by contrast, who you should study as perfect examples of how NOT to write for voice are J.S. Bach and Beethoven - both of whom seemed to forget, much of the time, that the human voice is not just another member of the strings section.
KM ===== My NEIL SHICOFF Website: http://www.radix.net/~dalila/shicoff/shicoff.html
My Website: http://www.radix.net/~dalila/index.html
----- We're sitting in the opera house; We're waiting for the curtain to arise With wonders for our eyes, A feeling of expectancy, A certain kind of ecstasy, Expectancy and ecstasy....Sh's's's.
- Charles Ives
|
| |