In a message dated 3/15/01 7:28:10 PM Central Standard Time,
bandb@n... writes:
bandb@n... writes:
> Tako
> >I would have assumed that too, except he said it was a "provocative"
> >word, implying it was more than simply happiness he was talking about.
>
> Tako I assume it is seen as provocative to challenge the side-lining
> of the word GAY, by both those who have claimed it.... the homosexual
> community...and those who have lost its sentiment,.... the non-homosexual
> others. Like it or not, this is a very provocative subject, however, it was
> simply another example of how a minority can corral a word which
> rightly belongs to the majority. The word tenor being the one I defend.
> Reg
>
>
>
>
This whole conversation is gay, and I don't mean in a happy or homosexual
way... lol.
Randy Buescher
|
