Mike the point as put forth by you, was the means and
results, of both effective and defective communications
as they affect students and the public in general. At least
that's what I understood by your comments.
Are you suggesting that this was not the point at all?
Reg.
.At 10:45 PM 08-03-01 -0500, you wrote:
>reg,
>
> as an even reluctant supporter of ralph nader, i have to wonder what
> the
>hell all this mentioning of our presidents has to do with anything i have
>been talking about. i'm talking about something that i'm trying to make as
>simple and direct as possible (like going to the bathroom should be). you
>seem to be confusing your politics with the point.
>
>mike
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
"One must have loved a woman of genius
to comprehend the happiness of loving a fool."
|
|  |
