| To: "'VOCALIST'" <vocalist> Subject: RE: Sarah Mclachlan/Maria Carey (just my own totally subjective v iew) Date sent: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:55:38 +0100 Send reply to: VOCALIST <vocalist>
Well, I welcome your totally subjective view. I don't think it's subjective either: you give reasons for each of your opinions, and, I'm sure, could cite specific instances of each point you make as evidence.
All in all, you've given certain of the listers (self included) an object lesson in how this list should be used.
Regards / vriendelijke groeten
Laurie Kubiak Commercial Analyst - Europe & Africa SMMS Sales and Contract Support, Shell Services International Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA Telephone: +44 171 934 3853; Fax: +44 171 934 6674 Mobile: 07771 971 921: E.mail: Laurence.l.Kubiak-at-is.shell.com Office: LON-SC 631
-----Original Message----- From: SingErato-at-aol.com [mailto:SingErato-at-aol.com] Sent: 28 January 2000 09:42 To: vocalist Subject: Re: Sarah Mclachlan/Maria Carey (just my own totally subjective view)
I absolutely fell in love with Sarah's voice and I finally figured out one reason why I enjoy listening to her. She sings with pure vowel sounds more often then the majority of contemporary singers. Her diphthongs are not so pronounced they are distracting. The warmth of her instrument lends itself very well to the material she sings. She has a purity in her voice, a mellow mezzo/alto range and she does use dynamics. Another thing is that the sound
just comes out less "manufactured" sounding, it has a "sincere" ring to it.
I prefer her to many, many of her contemporaries. Also, her lyrics lend themselves to the flow of her voice as she sings those words. Not an over abundance of sharp consonants.
For my taste, Mariah "breaks" up her vocal line so much, it's distracting. For me, listening to her singing isn't as enjoyable because of all the vocal
manipulation she does. Her natural vibrato becomes absolutely obliterated because of all the stop, starting glottal attacks instead of the words.. it
reeks of over embellishment and dilutes the impact of the actual voice, of which I'm sure she has, if only she'd let it shine through once in a while instead of giving in to what's currently "trendy" in the pop field. I would
love to hear her sing a song straight through without the "trademarks" she relies on. Just as any singer singing one way all the time, once you're used to hearing, "oh, she can really hit the high notes" or "wow, what flexibility", the overuse of these "tools" seems to limit her. The embellishments are used so much, they lose their effectiveness. If she were
interested in another field of singing and sang in that other style, it would probably make her even more versatile. I believe it takes away from the listening experience for me. I also can't stand this real "breathy" sound that's out there, using that to create the effect of "softness" or "lushness". It seems to dull the sound.
| |