| From: John Alexander Blyth Subject: Re: different voice techniques To: VOCALIST <vocalist> Send reply to: VOCALIST <vocalist>
HV, I studied a little of the Carnatic style with an excellent teacher here, but ultimately had to choose between it and western classical (where I live and breathe) singing. This may all sound *ex cathedra* but it's just my experience. A few points: I found the use of a drone accompaniment to be useful in practicing in the absence of an accompanist; also sa re ga ma pa da ni sa and do re mi fa so la ti do have enough in common that one may discuss the differences briefly: the Indian system changes the intervals, depending on the raga, but the names stay the same, unlike the solfege systems. Since Europe has both a fixed do and moveable do system, I assume there may be parallel disparities in India. The Carnatic style is learned by rote, starting with a fairly straightforward raga (some are different ascending from descending, somewhat parallel to the melodic minor) and singing scales, then patterns of carefully graded increasing complexity and speed. Students typically start at a very young age, and being a musician tends to run in the family. To the best of my knowledge developing and individual resonant tone isn't really stressed: one imitates the teacher's syllables. The preferred tone quality seems nasal to western ears, though this is mostly the 'i' vowel, the 'a' is still rather bright. Master singers use the syllables and patterns when improvising, which can be very exciting, especially when it goes into top speed. Westerners usually learn some version of solfege when young, and most children have some sort of choral experience in school, usually hymns or folk songs learned by rote. Unless one is fortunately placed to go into the school of a (mostly Anglican, and mostly in the UK) cathedral choir, one will have school and church choirs and school productions. None of these can really address the problems of classical vocal technique, which mostly require a somewhat mature voice (at least in which the vocal chords can adduce on some pitches and vowels), but general musicianship, sight-singing and other skills can be developed. I don't know anything at all about choral singing in India. I think the westerners tend to prize beauty of tone and dramatic communication above other aspects of singing, though the old bel canto repertoire requires considerable viruosity, and even a degree of improvisational skill. My 10c worth. John
... I'd be also interested in discussing the differences in vocal >> technique between Western (European) and Indian classical music. > John Blyth Bass/Baritone (as opposed to Bass-Baritone) etc. Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
| |